Research
project ideas for students of systematic musicology and music
psychology
Projektideen für
Masterarbeiten und
Dissertationen im Fach Systematische Musikwissenschaft
©
R. Parncutt 2006-2011
Liebe Studierende,
In den letzten Jahrzehnten ist die Musikpsychologie stark gewachsen. Die möglichen Forschungsfragen scheinen beinahe unbegrenzt zu sein. Im Vergleich zu dieser großen Vielfalt an Möglichkeiten stellen folgende Vorschläge eine kleine Auswahl dar. Wenn Sie Interesse an einer der folgenden Ideen haben, lade ich Sie ein, das Thema mit mir zu besprechen und ggf. anhand der neuesten Literatur zu ändern.
In der Regel finden Studierende im Forschungskolloqium Systematische Musikwissenschaft selbstständig ein eigenes Forschungsthema für ihre Bachelorarbeit, Masterarbeit oder Dissertation. Diese Datei soll Ihnen helfen, ein Thema zu finden, das Ihren Interessen, Erfahrungen und Fähigkeiten entspricht. Die Vorschläge beschränken sich auf empirische Projekte für Masterarbeiten und Dissertationen.Themen für Bachelorarbeiten entstehen in der Regel im Rahmen des Seminars Musikpsychologie im 5. Semester. (Idee: schauen Sie die am häufigsten zitierten musikpsychologischen Forschungsarbeiten an.)
Das Thema Ihrer Seminararbeit soll nicht mit dem Thema Ihrer Proseminararbeit "Einführung in die Musikpsychologie" im 2. Semester überschneiden. Es soll aber auch ähnlich oder gleich sein wie das Thema Ihrer Bachelorarbeit. Das kann gern wiederum ähnlich sein wie das Thema einer späteren Masterarbeit und sogar Dissertation. Es ist also eine gute Idee, langfristig zu denken. Wählen Sie zu Beginn des 5. Semesters einen vorläufigen Themenbereich für Ihre Masterarbeit (evtl. aus dieser Liste). Dann bearbeiten Sie die relevante Literatur im Seminar Musikpsychologie und in der Bachelorarbeit. Später werden Sie beim Masterprojekt schnell vorankommen.
Folgende
Texte sind auf Englisch
formuliert,
um die
englischsprachige Internetsuche zu ermöglichen und
ggf. ausländische Studierende anzulocken. Die
Abschlussarbeiten in
meinem Forschungskolloquium können auf Deutsch oder Englisch
verfasst werden.
Ich empfehle englischsprachige Abschlussarbeiten, weil sie im Internet
global
rezipiert und zitiert werden können - auch im
deutschsprachigen
Raum. Selbstverständlich biete ich Ihnen auch sprachliche
Unterstützung an. Wer eine wissenschaftliche Karriere plant
oder
die
Möglichkeit einer wissenschaftlichen Karriere nicht
ausschließen will, schreibt auf Englisch. mehr
List of project ideas
Music psychologists have
long talked
about the role of everyday sounds in music perception, but good
qualitative studies in music psychological journals of the perception
and meaning of everyday sounds are still lacking. Students in this
study will connect together two fields that have traditionally
worked separately: soundscape studies and music
psychology. There is a need to
understand everyday
sounds and music with an ecological approach using qualitative research
methods. A synergy could bring
new insight into
(i) how everyday sounds affect and control our everyday experience and
behavior, and (ii) the content, function, and meaning of music. Here
are some interesting links: International
Ambiences Network, World
Forum for Acoustic Ecology, interdisciplinary
approaches to soundscape studies.
This project could be
co-supervised by Institut für Geographie und Raumforschung und
the
Centre for Systematic Musicology, further information: Prof.
Dr.Justin Winkler.
Individual differences in the perception of chord roots
In Parncutt (1993), I tested and improved a model of pitch salience in musical chords (Parncutt, 1988; Terhardt, 1976). Although the data were consistent with the model, there is a need for a more comprehensive investigation (more chords, more listeners; comparison of results for chords of octave-complex tones with results for chords of harmonic-complex and pure tones). New data could lead to improvement of the model and development of new music-theoretical applications. We could for example do an internet survey whose software could also be used to test local listeners.
It would be especially interesting to compare results for "fundamental listeners" (GrundtonhörerInnen) and "overtone listeners" (ObertonhörerInnen). Seither-Preisler et al. (2007) and Schneider et al. (2005) found that when listeners were presented with harmonic complex tones with missing fundamentals, some consistently heard a pitch corresponding to the missing fundamental, while others consistently heard a pitch corresponding to a clearly audible partial. Musicians were more likely to fall into the first group ("fundamental listeners"). Only they are expected to hear chord roots in the way that I predicted in Parncutt (1988). This hypothesis has never been carefully tested. A possible co-supervisor for this project is Dr Annemarie Seither-Preisler, Institut für Psychologie der KFU; we are lucky that an international expert on this phenomenon is living and working right here in Graz.
The OMAS internet survey explored what environmental and social factors support the development of very good aural skills (Parncutt et al., 2006 c). Since we cannot rely on claims of internet participants’ about their aural skills, we will test these skills directly over the internet and focus on the data of participants with the best skills. This involves writing a test of aural abilities - specifically the ability to recognize musical intervals and chords when presented melodically or harmonically. The software has already been written as part of a Diplomarbeit (contact: Philip Weber, Institut für Angewandte Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikationstechnologie, TU Graz - a co-author of any future publication). The project may also involve analysis of other OMAS data on the origins of musical aural skills.
Many musicians claim that they can transcribe entire scores in real time in their minds as they listen. This feat has not yet been the subject of systematic empirical study. It would presumably be possible to find 5 or 10 such musicians in Graz and put their hearing to a stringent test. They would participate voluntarily because of their interest in demonstrating and understanding their ability. The data might help us to understand which aspects of musical structures are most difficult to perceive. Theories of the perception of pitch-time structures (masking, salience, Gestalt, auditory scene analysis..) might be able to explain the data. Cognitive music psychologists interested in musical expertise (e.g. Palmer, Sloboda) have discovered interesting things about how musicians perceive structure by studying the errors made by expert musicians, but no-one has ever done what I am suggesting. We would encourage the participants to participate in OMAS and ask what childhood experiences may underlie their exceptional abilities.
How big is our memory for music? One way to address this question is to ask how many songs the average person knows. 100? 1000? 10000? The answer to this question depends on your definition of "knowing". An experimental participant could be said to "know" a song if s/he can sing back most of the chorus and part of the verses (melody and lyrics) after hearing a few words/tones from the start or the chorus. Recognition shiould not be affected by musically typical changes to key, tempo, timbre or harmony. To make progress on this problem we need to explore the musical memory of individuals (case studies). That is hard to do because you have to guess what is in memory - there is no way to explore the contents of memory systematically. A possible approach is to use youself as an experimental subject. I have found the texts of about 700 songs that I "know" (you can read them by entering my homepage address and adding /ALLSONGS.doc; I have not linked this file to the internet because there might be a copyright problem). I guess if I sat at my computer for a few weeks I could expand this list to 2000 songs. The student doing this study could do exactly that and perhaps work with another student to get comparative data. We could then do some analysis of the content. The advantage of choosing this project is not only that it is interesting and ground-breaking but you will also end up with a very interesting documentation of your own musical memory.
What makes a pop song successful? Knowing the answer to this question would be like knowing how to predict future changes in currency exchange rates: you could make a lot of money. But it is unlikely that research will uncover universal principles for writing successful pop songs. Fashions and contexts change, so the success of song depends not only on the music itself (the structure of the melody, the timbre of the voice and so on) but also on the time and place. It should nevertheless be possible to retrospectively make generalizations about successful songs in a given place (e.g. Western international pop culture) and period (e.g. the 1960s). This project would involve first listing the top 50-100 pop from several periods (e.g. 1960s, 1970, 1980s, 1990s) on the basis of existing charts, transcribing the melody of each song (or finding reliable transcriptions), and calculating a range of quantitative parameters for each melody such as range in semitones, number of scale steps used, the same number weighted by frequency or use or duration, degree of chromaticism in melody, ditto in accompaniment, the range of note durations, the number of different note durations, the average number of notes per second, the range of this value, degree of syncopation, total duration of verses compared to choruses, degree of repetition (perhaps including different hierarchical levels), and so on. A similar study that is being carried out by Reinhard Kopiez and Daniel Müllensiefen (presented at DGM-Tagung, Würzburg 2010) uses sophisticated computing tools developed in music information retrieval; the present study is intended as a low-tech replication (the said parameters can be calculated by hand) that strives for a balance between subjective and objective approaches.
Performance
teachers'
aims, issues and values
Recent years have seen a steady stream of new edited books that present the results of music performance research. Parncutt and McPherson (2002) covered general aspects of music psychology, the psychology of specific musical skills and the acoustics of different musical instruments. Rink (1995, 2002) combined relevant humanities scholarship (including music history and analysis) and scientific research (e.g. in psychology of memory) with the academically grounded views and experience of excellent performers and teachers. Williamon (2004) surveyed a wide range of physical and psychological techniques that can help music students achieve excellence. Odam and Bannan (2005) addressed such topics as creativity, musical communication, improvisation, physiology of performance, and questions of artistic and ethnic interculturality. McPherson's (2006) book is oriented mainly towards children, but also includes a wealth of information that is relevant for music academies. Altenmüller, Wiesendanger and Kesselring (2006) focus on the physiological basis of the virtuoso technique and demonstrate convincingly that modern brain research can be directly relevant for musicians. Lehmann, Sloboda and Woody (2006) take as their focus psychological research that is relevant for musicians of all kinds, and help musicians without scientific or research training to interpret and apply the results of scientific research in music performance.
For this body of research to be useful for performers, it has to be made relevant and accessible for performance teachers and their students, who may be rightly suspicious of researchers who claim to know more than they do about their own craft. It is not enough simply to publish good research - it is also necessary to establish a constructive working relationship. One way to achieve this is to explore the important issues from the point of view of performers - both teachers and students - and then to investigate how existing research might contribute constructively and realistically to those specific issues.
This project would involve one or more of the following points:
An advantage of this topic is that it is strongly career oriented: a student who chooses this topic may one day be offered a position at a music academy.
Perception of musical roughness and dissonance
No currently available model of musical roughness reliably predicts empirical data on the perceived dissonance of musical chords (Parncutt, 2006 a). Recent studies have cast doubt on the role of roughness in dissonance perception (e.g. McLoughlin). But it is clear that a musical cluster is somehow rough. To develop a useful model of roughness for music-theoretical use, published data should be systematically compared with predictions of various models. A good model may need to account for
The following simple experiment could isolate the last point from the others: How rough are chords of octave-complex (Shepard) tones representing different pitch-class sets? It might be interesting to try to predict the perceived dissonance of all possible pitch-class sets (including inversions) of three tones or even four tones as a linear combination of different predictors including roughness and pitch ambiguity (the opposite of Stumpf's fusion, see Parncutt 1988). Statistically, this can be done by multiple regression between the predictors and the empirical data. But note that pitch ambiguity is not a very clear concept either. For example, the rock hit "Sweet Home Alabama" sounds consonant although its tonic (key) is ambiguous (Temperley, 2000).
I currently (2011) have a major article entitled "Consonance and dissonance in music theory and psychology: Disentangling dissonant dichotomies" with the Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies which I can make available to individuals.
Tonalness, consonance, and prevalence of pitch-class sets
Pitch-class sets (pc-sets) are sets of tones selected from the12 steps of chromatic scale (called "pitch classes" in music theory and "chroma" in music psychology). When each scale degree is labeled from 0 (C) to 11 (B), a C major triad becomes 047. Pc-sets can be generalized to be invariant under the mathematical operations transposition and inversion. In everyday language: 047 (C major) and 158 (Db major) both belong to the category "major triad", which can be expressed relative to the root as 047. A further level of abstraction is to consider all intervals within a set of tones. In the case of the major triad there are three intervals: 3, 4 and 5 semitones (intervals of 1, 2 and 6 semitones are absent). This set of intervals characterizes both the major and minor triads and is the basis for the corresponding "pc-set".
Pc-sets differ markedly in their tonalness. For example, the minor triad (in semitones above the root: 037) is highly tonal, while 012 is quite atonal. Pc-sets also vary in roughness: 021 is very rough and 037 is (relatively) very smooth. But there is no simple relationship between tonalness and roughness: some sets such as the diminished triad 036 are relatively atonal (in the sense of root ambiguity) but relatively consonant (in the sense of absence of dissonance). The situation is further complicated by the fact that our perception of pc-sets depends on our familiarity with them in tonal contexts. To begin to analyse this complexity, it would be necessary to first compare predicted tone profiles of pc-sets based on Krumhansl & Kessler (1982) and Parncutt (1982) with predictions of their roughness based on the average roughness of the six interval classes (cf. Huron, 1994) and the interval vector of each pc-set, which shows how often each interval class occurs in the set. The result would be tables of pc-sets with information about their tonal properties, which could be used by composers and music analysts. This is a good project for someone with basic programming skills. Another possibility is to ask to what extent composers of "atonal" music systematically avoid tonal references by consistently using the least tonal pc-sets. To answer this question, one count how often specific pc-sets occur in analyses of atonal music. The results of such as study might of course be affected by biases of the analysts, either toward or away from relatively tonal sets.
The perceived similarity of pc-sets is a central issue for composers versed in pc-set theory. For example, if a composer is aiming for coherence, s/he may work with pc-sets that sound similar to each other. Pc-set similarity is important in music analysis for similar reasons.
Several music theorists have developed mathematical models of the similarity of pc-sets, and the models have been tested empirically by researchers such as Samplaski and Kuusi using octave-complex (Shepard) tones (since the music theory to be tested is octave generalised). A problem with such studies is that the perceived similarity of two sonorities or melodies always depends on the number of common tones - or more generally on pitch commonality (Parncutt, 1989). How can this aspect be separated from the data? A idea:
1.
Qualitative, explorative stage: Free description of a range of
sonorities (What does this chord sound like? What does it remind you
of?) --> a list of adjectives
2. Quantitative stage: rate the same set of sonorities against the main
adjectives used in 1.
3. Factor analysis to reduce the number of scales (and adjectives);
repeat 2.
This approach could enable pc-set similarity to be quantified on a limited number of labelled dimensions. Assuming the dimensions to be independent, the distance between the sets could be calculated in Euclidean space and the results could be compared with music-theoretical predictions.
A further problem with empirical studies of pc-set similarity is that results are different for simultaneous and successive presentation. Since music-theoretical formulations of pc-set similarity do not consider roughness, they may better fit data on successive presentations. Ideally, this means presenting each pc-set in all possible orders - but that would mean an impossibly high number of trials. Instead one could present each set in a random order and average the responses of many listeners.
Affektenlehre
and the psychology of musical emotion
This is an interesting opportunity for interaction between historical musicology (or history of music theory) and music psychology. text in preparation
Mood regulation and the origins of music
Saarikallio studied people's use of music to regulate their own mood and identified functions of music such as entertainment, revival/recovery, strong sensation, distraction, emotional discharge, mental work and solace. For children, music has a calming effect, helps them to concentrate, makes them happy and inspires fantasy (at least according to their parents). Such empirically determined lists and classifications could contribute to our understanding of music's ultimate nature and origins. In this study, different behavioral theories of the origin of music will be compared. "Behavioral theory" refers to the idea that a universal non-musical human behavior might represent the origin of music. We will hypothesise that behaviors that are more similar to music are more likely to represent its origin. Similarity can be evaluated by analysing behaviors (including music) into lists of aspects or features and comparing the lists. Relevant behaviors are flirting (Darwin's theory that music is used to attract mates), motherese (Dissanayake's idea that motherese represents the origin of music and perhaps of all arts), and social interaction and cohesion in general (a widely held theory of the origin of music which includes the previous two but is much broader) . The study will begin by surveying theories of the origin of music, separating out those that are based on (almost) universal human behaviors, empirically analysing goals, functions and strategies associated with those behaviors, and comparing the behaviors with each other by comparing the lists.
Why do people download music from the internet?
Many people spend enormous amounts of time downloading music from the internet. Why do they do that? Possible reasons include: they feel good when they hear the music, they are curious about new music by a composer-performer whom they know, they want to be part of a group of people that likes a certain kind of music. Are the emotions experienced while listening to the music is the main reason for downloading it? If so, what kind of emotions are they? This study aims to clarify these issues. Participants are people who often download music. They receive a notebook in which they answer a set of questions every time they download music (or they fill in a form on the computer, or record a message using a mobile phone). What music did they just download and why? What do they expect to get out of it? Can they describe the feelings they have when listening to the music? Do they know other people who listen to this kind of music? The responses would analysed using standard qualitative methods. it may be possible to get funding from a company with a financial interest in legal internet downloads.
Emotional
properties of everyday sounds
No one is sure why musical sounds are so emotional and where the emotion ultimately comes from, although there is no lack of speculative theories. One possibility is that musical sounds are related to everyday non-musical sounds that have their own intrinsic emotionality. One way to approach this idea is to take a bunch of everyday sounds, present them to listeners, ask them to describe them, extract the emotional aspects of their explanations, and attempt to explain their origins. Or you could ask the listeners to rate the sounds on different emotional or other scales. Christian Kaernbach has recently done some work like this, and meanwhile a new database of everyday sounds is available - which is useful because the sounds are standardized when they come from a public database.
Emotional connotations of major and minor
The emotional valence (the happy/sad dimension) of musical structures and, in particular, the major and minor triads seems to be one of music psychology's great mysteries. Ask ten music psychologists and you will get ten different answers. Countless researchers have wondered how to explain the origin of this phenomenon. Some even try to deny that the problem exists, but a casual survey of the tonalities of pieces of western music that are considered to be joyful and tragic confirms that joyful music is usually major and tragic minor. The exceptions do not seem hard to explain, for example those happy Hungarian or Jewish melodies in minor keys are evidently happy because of other features such as tempo, articulation, timbre and text. Is it simply the case that the major triad sounds happier because it is stable, which in turn is because it is more similar to the harmonic series and therefore has a clearer root (cf. Parncutt, 1988)? The chromaticism of music in minor keys (e.g. J.S. Bach, Mozart) is consistent with the idea that the minor triad is less stable, but also suggests that the happy/sad dimension might depend more directly on the voice-leading than on the triads themselves (cf. Meyer, 1956). To address this issue systematically, it will first be necessary to state the problem clearly. What exactly sounds happy or sad, and in what context? If randomly transposed triads in different inversions are presented to listeners, do the major ones really tend to sound happier? And how do the results depend on whether the listeners can recognize a triad as major or minor? That would be a straightforward first experiment. But music-theoretic considerations suggest that tonalities, not chords, sound happy (major) or sad (minor). If that is the case, one and the same major chord should sound happy if presented in a major-key context (as I, IV or V) and sad if presented in a minor key context (as III, V or VI). This hypothesis would be easy to text in a listening experiment, and the music-psychology community would be interesting to read about the results. The project would begin with a survey of relevant literature from different areas of musicology (not only psychology, but also theory and history). An alternative explanation for the sadness of minor has it that the minor third interval by itself communicates sadness in both music and speech (Curtis & Bharucha, 2010). But if that is true, are well-known alternative explanations such as the information-theoretic approach of Meyer (1956) incorrect? Or can two different explanations be correct at the same time? If so, is it a coincidence that two different phenomena reinforce each other? Incidentally, in such projects it is always interesting to use sounds that have been used in other projects so that data can be compared. Try this
Music
and
love (or: music and personal relationships)
The word "love" is taboo in academic discourse. As soon as you mention it, people get embarrassed and start to suspect you are one of those wishy-washy fuzzy pseudo scientists for whom research is either self-therapy or an ego booster. There are indeed plenty of such researchers in the world, and it is important to maintain critical distance from them. But since love is a powerful emotion upon human survival depends, and since love is often associated with music, music psychologists should be interested in understanding it better, and many in fact are (e.g. Gunter Kreutz).
From an evolutionary viewpoint, love is what you feel when you are behaving in a way that will promote the transmission of your genes to future generations. Love motivates us to reproduce and to look after our children and grandchildren. It also motivates us to care for people who care for us (reciprocal altruism) or might even save our lives in a difficult situation. That music is associated with love is clear simply from the prevalence of love songs in practically all vocal styles, genres and cultures.
How can the link between music and love be better understood? Consider these possibilities:
A new popular scientific online magazine is addressing the spiritual significance of music from many different standpoints. If you go to their homepage and click on "releases" you will see an advertisement for a book based on musicians' answers to the question "What do you believe is the spiritual significance of music?" That could also be an appropriate topic for a research project in music psychology. Prerequisite is a thorough knowledge of qualititative research methods (e.g. Mayring, 2002).
Strong experiences of music by the deaf
That music plays an important role for people with impaired hearing is clear from the international success of the deaf percussionist Evelyn Glennie. This raises the question of music's emotionality for deaf listeners. The project would essentially involve a repeat of Gabrielsson & Lindström Wik (2003).
The
historical
development of tonal-harmonic syntax and the
origins of tonality
The key profiles of Krumhansl and Kessler (1982) correlate well (r ~ 0.95, df=10) with the pitch salience profiles of major and minor triads (Parncutt, 1988, 1999 a). A possible explanation is that major-minor tonality “emerged” in the Renaissance as major and minor triads became prevalent (although music theorists had not yet named them) - first within harmonic progressions, and later as final sonorities. Composers and improvisers may have maximized the closure of perfect cadences by intuitively adjusting the prevalence of each chromatic pitch class to match the pitch-salience profile of the final triad. Thus, major-minor tonality prolongs the tonic triad (Schenker, 1906).
This has interesting implications for music history, theory and psychology. Historically, one might begin to systematically consider the western history of music perception (cf. Eberlein, 1994). Moment-to-moment expectations during a musical passage depend on repeated exposure to specific musical patterns in the past. One might investigate the history of music perception by statistically analysing a computer database of music representative of each century or period using Huron’s (2002) Humdrum. This is a major project whose results would bring us closer to predicting the syntax of tonal western music (prevalence of specific pitch-time patterns) from a limited number of perceptual and cultural assumptions.
Peak
experiences in
different art forms
Strong emotions are experienced in art forms that develop with time, from one second or minute to the next: music, drama and literature (as one reads a book), and combinations such as musical drama (opera, musical) and film. Strong emotions are characterized by physiological reactions such as goose bumps, chills down the spine, tears, racing heartbeat, lump in the throat and so on. The emotions experienced when looking at or otherwise experiencing static visual art (paintings, sculpture, architecture) seem to be less strong, presumably due to the absence of temporal change in the art form itself. In this study, randomly selected people will be interviewed about their memory of strong experiences in any art form in order to get some idea of the differences between art forms regarding the strength and kind of emotions that they evoke. An exploratory qualitative study.
Altered states,
trance, estacy, flow
This topic has been avoided in scientific research for similar reasons that questions of musical emotion were avoided - it's hard to test hypotheses on the basis of quantitative data. A further problem: in many musical cultures where people go into trance states in religious ceremonies (generally supported by music), they are constantly moving, which makes any kind of physiological measurement difficult. As technologies improve, this problem is being overcome. Meanwhile there is still a lot to be learned from qualitative studies such as the Diplomarbeit of Graz student Anita Taschler (see also the conference presentations by Taschler and Parncutt, you can download the ppt files from my publications page). An article by ethnomusicologist Judith Becker (2009) in Empirical Musicology Review talked about why this research has been neglected and the difficulties of reconciling the contrasting approaches of humanities and sciences. The apparently universal link between trance, music and religious ritual suggests that an understanding of this phenomenon will help us to understand the original and ultimate function of music. For all these reasons this has become a very interesting area in which to work.
In music theory in the English language, the tonic is often referred to as the "home key" and a return to the tonic after modulation to other keys (e.g. in a classical development section) is referred to as a "return home". The implication is that the feeling of coming back to the tonic is like coming back home after a journey and re-establishing one's original or genuine identity. For example, Beethoven’s sonata Op. 81a is labeled farewell, absence and return; distance from the tonic in Schubert’s Die schöne Müllerin symbolizes estrangement and death (Youens, 1992).
In everyday life and independently of music, home means familiar faces (family, community) and places (territory). Animals identify and defend home territory; humans invest in creating/maintaining homes. The home has survival value for defence, recovery, healing, nourishment; children’s survival depends on proximity to home (Kahn & Kellert, 2002). The home is decorated with art and cherished objects that reflect/construct the inhabitants’ identity (Sherman & Dacher, 2005) and present a coherent narrative (Woodward, 2001). Home underlies personal identity (Proshansky et al., 1983); nomadic peoples feel strong spiritual attachments to homelands (Strang, 2000).
The emotional connotations of tonic and the home may be related to each other. Tonic return evokes positive emotions; its violation (interrupted cadence) evokes negativity and/or arousal (Meyer, 1956; Steinbeis et al., 2006). Major-minor tonal music is emotionally more positive than atonal for both westerners and non-westerners (Marin & Parncutt, 2007). Is that because its consonant sounds (major and minor triads etc.) are somehow universally pleasant or attractive? Or because the clear hierarchical structure of tonal music means that fewer cognitive resources are needed to process it? Or is tonal music preferred because of its prevalence (familiarity) and prevalent for political reasons (global dominance of western culture)? Or because tonal music somehow satisfies a need to feel at home, or to go away from and return to home?
Given this background, it is interesting to ask whether, or to what extent, the feeling of coming home in a piece of music psychologically is related to the more general (and indeed universal) feeling of coming home. This question may be addressed theoretically or empirically.
Theoretically, one might survey the psychological and sociological literature on the concept of home. What exactly does home mean for people and what is included in a typical home schema? The concept is also relevant for modern problems of migration and integration - to what extent do migrants create a new home for themselves in a foreign place and what factors make this possible or likely? Why is it often so hard for locals to tolerate foreigners coming to their home town and to accept multiculturality as part of their home?
It is not easy to test such a hypothesis empirically. Here are some contrasting approaches.
A psychoacoustically based, computer assisted music theory
Pitch-class set theory (Forte, 1973) and pitch salience theory (Parncutt, 1988) might be usefully combined in computer-assisted music theory pedagogy. The project would involve two stages: writing and testing the software, and testing its pedagogical effectiveness in collaboration with music theorists and composers. The project may involve collaboration with KUG Institutes 1 & 16.
Psychological reality of published music analyses
Look in the music analysis literature for different analyses of the same pieces. The pieces should be relatively short. For each piece, carry out a series of psychological analyses, e.g.
In each case, compare the empirical results with analytical results and commonalites and differences analysed. Since results depend not only on the score of the piece to be analysed but also on the interpretation, find several different recorded performances of each piece and present different performances to different participants. The participants themselves could be a mixture of musicians and non-musicians.
Psychological
testing of alternative music notations
Conventional music notation, in which the tones of a diatonic scale correspond to the lines and spaces of a musical staff, may not be ideally suited for music in which every pitch in the chromatic scale occurs regularly, i.e. for the Western music of the past few centuries. The main problems are that conventional notation represents 12 pitches per octave by means of 7 vertical positions plus sharps and flats, and that it represents the same pitch class quite differently in different octave registers. In response to these problems, countless alternative notations have been developed and proposed in recent centuries. Read (1987) wrote a book about them, and the Music Notation Modernization Association attempted to evaluated many of them systematically. Othe reason why none of these alternative notations has caught on is presumably that it takes a lot of time and effort to learn a new notation system. Not only professional musicians, but also musicologists (including music psychologists and music theorists) invest enormous amounts of time learning to read conventional music notation. Understandable, they don't want to have to start again from scratch. So they tend to avoid the problem of conventional notation's shortcomings and the evaluation of alternatives by regarding the problem either as irrelevant ("conventional notation obviously cannot be improved") or impossible to solve ("it is clearly impossible to decide among the many possible alternatives"). But perhaps the real reason is that it is not worth learning an alternative notation unless a very large library of musical scores in that notation exists, so that one can always find the score of a specific piece. Whatever the reason, the problem has achieved a kind of taboo status. Experience with other academic taboos (think for example of the role of sexuality in music analysis) suggests that this taboo will one day be broken.
In recent years, the question of alternative notations has again become interesting - for a quite different reason. Modern computing technology makes it possible to automatically transcribe printed music in conventional western notation into other systems. This means that it is finally worth investing the time and effort into learning an alternative system.
In Parncutt (1999), I presented an experiment to compare different alternative music notations. The experiment has never actually been done. The idea is to break conventional music notation down into separate components and test each of these components by comparision to other possibilities. I now have access to a tailor-made computer program based on Finale that converts Finale data files into alternative notations. In collaboration with the author of the program, this could be used both to prepare the experimental stimuli and, independently of the empirical project, to transcribe music into alternative notations.
Forward motion in chord progressions
Chord progressions in which roots descend by fifths or thirds (e.g. C-F, C-a) are more common in Western music of the 17th-19th Centuries, as well as Jazz in the 20th, than progressions in which roots ascend by fifths or thirds (e.g. C-G. C-e) (Parncutt, 2004). Consider for example the familiar progressions ii-V-I, I-vi-iv-ii-V-I, I-vi-ii-V-I. Why? This asymmetry is by no means a universal feature of major-minor (ish) tonalities such as Renaissance polyphony (see my presentation at MedRen 2000) and pop/rock harmony (see Temperley's paper at ICMPC 2000 and this link). One possiblity is that 17th-19th listeners preferred progressions in which tones implied by the first chord are realised by the second. According to virtual pitch theory (Terhardt, 1976), the chord CEG implies pitches at the missing fundamentals F and A, which are “realised” if the following chord is FAC or ACE but if it is GBD or EBG. A further complication is that the rising-falling asymmetry is clearer in the musical literature than in similarity judgments of successive musical chords (Parncutt, 1993). That experiment could be repeated using different chords, durations, listeners and musical contexts, and the asymmetry modelled mathematically.
Fifth
relationships between successive chord-roots
The most prevalent chord progressions in tonal harmony have fourth and fifth intervals between successive chord roots. Why? A possible answer is that the perfect fifth interval is the most consonant interval after the octave. But it is unclear what that means in the case of successive tones that are also chord roots. Consider this simpler, more straightforward explanation: if you are performing vocal polyphony in a 15th-Century church, it will be easier to sing in tune (or to find the pitches at all) if successive chords have at least one tone in common. If two triads have two tones in common, only one tone will move, so we can hardly speak of harmonic progression any more. This simple logic we can explain the predominance of triadic progressions with one common tone. And if both triads are composed of tones belonging to the same diatonic scale, the interval between the roots will automatically be a fourth or fifth. Thus, we don't need to know anything about Pythagorean number-ratio theory in order to explain the predominance of fourth and fifth intervals between successive chord roots. Nor do we need to assume that the cycle of fifths has psychological reality, as some research in cognitive music psychology has done. This study would primarily involve a new analysis of selected pieces of unaccompanied polyphony from the 14th-16th Centuries. Given two successive "sonorities" (and regardless of how composers and theorists of the time might have thought about "harmony" or "sonority"), how many tones do they usually have in common, under what circumstances? Are suspensions used to increase the effective number of tones in common? Is there plausible evidence in the music of this period that the origin of fourth/fifth relationships between successive roots in major-minor music lies mainly in practical limitations on the number of common tones between successive chords?
Empirical
determination and
tracking of
musical key using probe triads
The
probe tone method of Krumhansl and Kessler (1982) enabled music
psychologists to make significant contributions to music theory by
quantifying the theoretical concept of stability - the tonic scale
degree as stable, the leading tone as unstable, and other tones with
different levels of stability. A fundamental problem with their
method is the assumption that the tonic is a tone. That may be true in
many musical styles, but Western major-minor tonality is surely unusual
in that it is based on sonorities of several voices, which can also
function as tonics in their own right. In other words, the tonic of a
major or minor
key may be either the tonic triad or its root, the tonic tone.
Consistent with that idea, Riemann developed a theory of tonal
function in which dominant and subdominant triads are perceived
relative to the tonic triad, and Schenker explained tonal
works
as prolongations of their tonic triads. The idea has
interesting empirical implications: the tonality of a passage
may be determined by presenting it followed by one of 24 major and
minor triads and asking how well the triad follows the passage. The
results of such an experiment would presumably be similar to
Krumhansl's more complex (less
parsimonious) method, explained in detail in Krumhansl (1990), in which
listeners rated how well probe tones followed passages were used and
tone
profiles were compared (correlated) with the standard profiles of major
and minor keys. A study in which
results obtained from these two methods were compared with the
judgments of music theorists could shed light on the nature of the
tonal reference in major-minor music: Is it
a tone or a triad? Or if it is both, to what extent is it one or the
other? The
results could also have interesting implications for key-finding
models, to which a whole issue of the journal Music Perception
was devoted (Vos & Leman, 2001).
Perceptual
bases of Schenkerian theory
In Parncutt (1996), I considered some of the unexplored similarities between principles of Schenkerian theory and analysis (as summarized e.g. by Drabkin, 2002; Forte & Gilbert, 1982; Larson, in press) and psychological principles (e.g. Huron, 2001; Parncutt, 2004). Is a compound melody explicable by Bregman's (1993) theory of streaming? Are neighbor tones explicable by van Noorden's (1975) concept of fusion? Can implied tones be predicted by combining harmonic pattern recognition and streaming? Does a linear intervallic pattern obey Gesalt principles of good continuation? Is tonicization an increase in pitch salience? Are registral shifts due to the pitch ambiguity of harmonic complex tones? Is diminution related to Chomsky's generative grammars? Is the Ursatz a psychological schema? This project would be mainly theoretical and you would need a good background in both music theory and music psychology to tackle it.
Immanent
versus performed
accents
I
would like to bring together pianists and psychologists to bridge the
gaps between their approaches to research practical issues. A possible
experiment: If the theory of musical accent presented in Parncutt
(2003) (cf. Palmer and Hutchins, 2006) is valid, it should be possible
(1) to help performers prepare performances by analysing their
repertoire, and their performances of it, according to the theory; and
(2) to describe the unconscious decisions made by performers when
interpreting a piece of music (cf. Clarke, 1995). Pianists would be
suitable participants as they tend to think analytically and, when
playing alone, have control over the entire musical texture. The
project may involve collaboration with KUG.
Expressive music performance includes tempo changes that are not notated. For example, a pianist may speed up during a "development" section in which different tonalities are visited and themes varied - an effect sometimes called stretto. Consider the following two well-known examples from the piano repertoire: the middle section of Schumann's Träumerei, and the episodes between repetitions of the rondo theme in Beethoven's Für Elise. In this project we test the hypothesis that in the performance of tonal music, performance tempo is slightly slower in passages in the tonic key and in thematic passages. By "thematic passage" I mean the duration of a well-defined melody or theme (in the theory of sonata form, for example, the first and second subjects), as opposed to transitional passage or bridges. The project will involve selecting a set of repertoire for analysis according to clear criteria (say, 20 contrasting pieces), finding many commercial recordings of that repertoire (say 10, contrasting recordings per piece), analysing the score for passages in the tonic key and thematic passages, measuring the duration of those passages in the recordings and dividing by the number of measures to calculate the tempo, and statistically analysing the data. If the hypotheses are confirmed, we will then ask whether they are an artifact of some other effect. For example, perhaps pianists tend to speed up when there are more notes per measure (Sundberg and Friberg called this effect "the faster, the faster" in their performance rule system). For the first movement of Beethoven's Waldstein sonata, this idea would predict that the first subject in C major is performed faster than the second subject in E major, which would contradict our original hypothesis. To test this, we will calculate the mean number of notes per bar in each analysed section of the selected works and compare those values with the measured tempos.
Pedagogical
application
of automatic fingering models
In
Parncutt et al. (1997) I developed an algorithm for fingering melodic
fragments in piano performance. Meanwhile computer programs have been
developed for fingering guitar and violin.
The
question is now whether these models can be applied in music education.
One possibility is to teach music students the underlying principles of
these algorithms and find out if they find those principles useful when
deciding on fingerings. Another possibility is to develop a
user-friendly interface that musicians can use. The interface would
systematically offer different fingering possibilities for given
passages that students could then try out in order to expand their
fingering vocabulary. Participants in such a project would be limited
to those with a relatively analytical and systematic approach to
technical problems. A possible hypothesis is that a systematic,
computer-supported approach to fingering problems can usefully
complement existing approaches to technical development such as scales,
arpeggios and technical exercises.
Structured listening to recover a performer's conception of musical structure
How, and how successfully do performers communicate structure? In this experiment, performers (probably pianists, as piano MIDI data are easier to handle and control) listen to their own performances of a given repertoire and mark salient events on the score - either immanent (in the score, independent of performance) and expressive (performed). Other listeners do the same. The results are compared to find out what kinds of structural intention are most successfully realised. The results are also be compared with MIDI data to understand how specific intentions are realised (e.g. in terms of tempo and dynamic curves) and in an attempt to explain why certain intentions are easier to communicate than others.
Rhythm, walking, heartbeat and emotion
What
is the origin of musical rhythm? What role might walking and heartbeats
have played? How does rhythm communicate emotion? Participants would be
“wired up” to simultaneously record the times at
which
their feet hit the ground and their hearts beat during normal everyday
activities. This could be done using commercially available jogging
equipment (Barnett, 2003; Shoji, 2004; see also the New
York Times article at the foot
of this page). Walking and
heartrate distributions (mode, width, asymmetry…) would be
compared with musical tempo distributions. An additional possibility
might be to monitor emotional state by random cellphone calls.
In a
recent study at the University of
Jyväskylä by Luck, Saarikallio,
Thompson, Burger and Toiviainen
(presented at ICMPC 2000 in Seattle) volunteers were asked to
dance to different styles
of music. Their spontaneous dance movements were compared with (i) the
musical style and (ii) the personality of the dancer. Data were
collected with a sophisticated optical motion
capture system, but many of the results could also have
obtained by low-tech systematic observation (each method has specific
advantages and disadvantages). In this study, volunteers (e.g.
musicology and psychology students) will be asked to dance alone to
selections of music corresponding to different styles (rock, funk,
folk, bebop...). Better, a party will be organised at which the guests
agree in advance to having their dance movements videoed and viewed
later by specific named people (members of the research team). That
raises the interesting possibility (never before investigated, as far
as I know) of systematically studying the effect of alcohol on dance
movements in different styles and for different personalities (e.g.
first record dance movements with no alcohol, then after one standard
drink, then two, then three). This question is socially relevant (many
people would be interested in the results) and the proposed method
would have a relatively high degree of ecological validity (i.e. the
situation would be relatively natural). Data analysis will involve both
free description (qualitative analysis) and ratings (quantitative
analysis). The videos will be viewed (mainly without sound) by student
volunteers who are given clear instructions and some practice. In
quantitative analyses, for example, the observers will rate the size
and quality (e.g. smooth versus jagged) of movements in different parts
of the body, without knowing which music was playing. If several
dancers are recorded simultaneously, the observers will also describe
or rate aspects of their spontaneous interactions. At the end, the
dancers will be asked to complete a personality evaluation
questionnaire. Results will be compared with published results of the
Jyväskylä group.
Effect of analytical or intellectual engagement on enjoyment of music
Some musicians report that their enjoyment of music deteriorates when they analyse the music or their performance of it. Others report just the opposite. To understand this phenomenon, one might first interview music students about the effect of analytical knowledge on their enjoyment of music, separating different music styles and kinds of academic engagement (analysis, performance, history, psychology and so on). One might also conduct a longitudinal study on participants in an ear training or music theory course.
Emotion in Western classical music
Juslin and Persson (2002) analysed emotional expression in music by separating individual acoustic cues in structural parameters such as tempo, articulation, dynamic, timbre, timing, duational contrast, as well as variations in all such parameters. It would be an interesting project to analyse how a well-known Western composer (such as for example Mozart) communicated different emotions through written scores. The question sounds simple, but experience suggests that a detailed analysis can improve understanding and may even bring some surprises. The project might first involve selecting a number of short excerpts from the repertoire of that composer. The criterion for selection might simply be preference, which tends to reflect emotional intensity: just ask people which music they like the most, or use music for which the greatest number of recordings are available. Then ask listeners in a pretest what specific emotions are communicated by the excerpts. Since these data will depend on the interpretation (acoustic realisation) of each piece, compare contrasting interpretations. Then analyse the structure of the corresponding original scores by objective procedures that can be accurately described in your method section. For example, how many different note durations occur in the excerpt, and what is the relative frequency of occurrence of each (note duration distribution)? How stable is the tonality (pitch class distribution or tone profile), to what extent is the excerpt in a major or minor tonality, and how often to dissonances happen relative to consonances? On the basis of such data it may be possible to draw up a table of specific ways in which that composer communicates specific emotions in music notation, analogous to Juslin's table, and presumably also similar to it.
The musical emotions nostalgia
and sentimentality
Emotions such as nostalgia, magic, movement and arousal are more common in music than in everyday life (Scherer et al., 2001-02). To understand why this is so, one might survey humanities literature (history, philosophy, aesthetics, cultural studies, semiotics); create a library of nostalgic/sentimental music; have listeners rate each item’s expression of other emotions; ask musicians which musical structures evoke nostalgia and sentimentality (cf. Sloboda, 1991); and explore the evolutionary functions of these emotions. This project may involve collaboration with the Institut für Wertungsforschung der KUG.
Individual differences in motherese and personality
All parents and adults speak differently when the person to whom they happen to be "talking" is a baby. To what extent do parents differ from each other, and what does that depend on? In this experiment, parents will be recorded while engaging in motherese - musical vocal-gestural enchanges with their babies. The degree to which their speech shows typical characteristics of motherese (e.g. higher than normal frequency, exaggerated changes in frequency) will be evaluated by independent listeners. Perhaps different motherese styles can also be qualitatively characterized. These data will then be compared with independently gathered data on the personalities of the parents and perhaps also of the babies, using current theories of personality and standard scales and questionnaires. It might also be interesting to compare these data with the parents' own subjective accounts of their personality, the personality of their babies, and the strength and nature of their own motherese. The ultimate aim of the study is to understand the functions and variability of motherese in more detail, in order to get more insight into the nature, ontogenesis and phylogenesis of music.
Differences
between
motherese and regular speech
What is the difference between infant-directed and adult-directed speech? A lot of research has been done on frequency contours and duration patterns in motherese, as well as syntax and semantics (e.g. the prevalence of specific parts of speech such as nouns), but what about specific vowels and consonants? Since the aim of motherese is often to make the baby smile (which motivates the adult to continue playing the motherese game), one might hypothesize that the "ee" sound associated with smiling happens more often in motherese than in regular speech. That is, not only is the mean fundamental frequency of motherese higher than normal, but also the mean formant frequency. If that is true, it can be explained in another way: the baby's formant frequencies are higher due to its shorter vocal tract. Whatever the explanation, the first question to answer is an empirical one: are "ee" sounds more common in motherese than in regular speech? And does that explain the "ee" endings of "baby words" like teady, horsey or Johnny? The project would involve transcribing the text of a few hours of infant-directed speech by different adults and comparing the results with recordings of natural improvised speech by the same speakers. The results have implications for emotional connotations of timbre: bright timbres tend to be associated with positive emotional valence, and these are possible reasons. That raises an additional question: are babies directly sensitive to the association between sound timbre and emotional valence (both within and outside speech), or must they see the smiling lips of the adult before they make the connection?
Motherese in children's story CDs
There are many studies on motherese (infant-adult vocal play). The exaggerated contours of motherese attract the baby's attention, strengthen bonding, and promote language acquisition. To what extent are similar techniques used by adults who read stories aloud to children? To what extent may these techniques be regarded as musical or at least pre- or proto-musical? Are adults reading children's books aware that they are speaking motherese? The project might involve comparing recordings of motherese in natural situations with commercially available CDs of children's stories and/or with recordings of adults reading stories to children. The comparison could be both quantitative and qualitative. Quantitatively, one could track the fundamental frequency and compare statistics such as the mean and standard deviation of the fundamental frequency as well as its first derivative (i.e. how quickly it changes). It would also be interesting to compare the mean and standard deviaion of tempo measured simply as number of syllables per second. Qualitatively, listeners could continuously evaluate the emotional content both of the original recordings and low-pass-filtered recordings in which little more than the fundamental frequency is audible. The quantitative evaluations could then be compared with the quantitative measures.
Emotional communication between mother and fetus
Why do musical sound patterns evoke strong emotional responses? In Parncutt (2006 b) and Parncutt & Kessler (2006), I asked whether the human fetus perceives the (emotional) state of the mother via the sound of her voice, heartbeat, breathing, movements, footsteps and digestive sounds. If so, fetal behaviour should depend on maternal state (cf. Mastropieri & Turkewitz, 1999). Participants would be pregnant women in the third trimester. Their (emotional) state and fetal movement would be monitored physiologically and subjectively, by cellphone calls. For this project to be successful, it would be necessary first to establish good connections with relevant departments of the LKH or with Sanatoria.
Recognition of emotional states from internal body sounds
Can one judge a person’s emotional state from their internal body sounds? The question is relevant for the theory that the origin of musical emotion lies in prenatal associations between sound, movement and emotion (Parncutt, 2006; Parncutt & Kessler, 2006). This question could be tackled empirically as follows. First, survey the medical literature on auscultation - listening to internal body sounds using a stethoscope to diagnose the cardiovascular system (heart murmurs and gallops), the respiratory system (wheezes and crackles) and the gastrointestinal system. To hear some examples go to this link. Such sounds could be presented to listeners who would be asked to rate their emotional content. Or computer composers could try incorporating these sounds into their music and later speak about their emotional connotations. A follow-up study could be run as follows:
Ecological
theory of electroacoustic music
In an ecological approach, one might expect electroacoustic (or acousmatic) music to be preferred by listeners if they are able to imagine virtual objects that produce the sounds. The more precisely they can describe those objects and the more consistent their descriptions are (both within and between listeners), the more they should like the music. The aim of this study would be to test that hypothesis. Listeners with different musical preferences, amounts of musical expertise and kinds of listening experience would be presented with short excerpts from a wide range of electroacoustic styles that focus on timbre and avoid familiar tonalities, meters and forms. The listeners would be asked either to describe the objects that make the sounds that they hear or to evaluate the music (cf. DiScipios's theory of audible ecosystems).
Dowling investigated the relative importance of contour and rhythm for the recognition of melodies. By comparision, how important is pitch salience? Huron (2001) emphasized the importance of pitch salience for counterpoint. Pitch salience can be manipulated by removing different numbers of lower harmonics and by taking random selections of harmonics in a given range of harmonic numbers or of frequency. Listeners could be asked either to recognize or (in the case of musically trained listeners) to transcribe the melodies.
Most musicians have experienced pitch shifts. Imagine you are trying to sleep and but there is loud rock music playing somewhere outside. You hear mainly the bass line thumping away but sometimes you also hear the melody. Strangely, the singer seems to be singing in a different key. But if you hear the music at normal loudness level with normal balance it sounds fine. Another example: you are listening to pop songs on headphones in an airplane. There is a lot of background noise from the jet engines and the headphones don't fit properly into your ears. You can hear the singer's voice, but the accompaniment is hard to hear and when you do hear it, it sounds out of tune. In both these cases the (physical) frequencies are exactly the same in all listening conditions, but the (experienced) pitches are not. In general, pitch depends on SPL relationships and masking - an effect known as pitch shift.
A central tenet of Terhardt's pitch theory is that the exact perceived pitch of any partial (spectral pitch) within a complex tone depends on its SPL and on the frequency and amplitude of other, nearby partials. Thus, the spectral pitches within a typical complex tone are all slightly shifted. This, he proposed, distorts the pattern of pitches within harmonic complex tones to which we are exposed in everyday sounds and especially speech: the harmonic series "template" that the brain may be considered to use to identify fundamental frequencies in everyday running spectra is slightly stretched. This was Terhardt's explanation of the octave stretch phenomenon (listeners prefer octaves that are slightly stretched relative to a frequency ratio of 2:1, and octaves in music performance also tend to be slightly stretched). All this was incorporated into a rather complex mathematical model (algorithm) whose predictions were tested against a range of empirical data (Terhardt et al., 1982). As far as I know, this is still the only available computer model that takes any sound as its input and attempts to predict all perceived pitches including their shifts and their saliences. It is also still the best explanation for octave stretch.
Recent years have seen the publication of many papers on the phenomenon of pitch shift that go well beyond Terhardt's approach and contradict some of his findings and assumptions (just type "Terhardt 'pitch shift' octave stretch" into Google Scholar). For example, pitch shifts can be produced by by interactions with the harmonic "template" or by time-domain effects (phase differences between partials). These recent papers seldom discuss the musical relevance of their findings.
A masters or doctoral project might first involve a survey of this recent work and the question of its musical relevance, followed by an experiment such as the following. Take harmonic complex tones with different numbers of missing lower harmonics: for example, the lowest harmonic might be number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. Have the listener adjust the frequency of a pure comparison tone until the two tones have the same pitch (in the usual way). The experiment must be conducted using a good sound card and good headphones, and good measuring equipment may be required to check that the sound pressure levels are correct and distortion inaudible (ask at KUG:IEM). How big are the observed interval stretches? Do they correspond to empirically observed stretching in musical intervals greater than or equal to one octave (e.g. Rakowski et al in the proceedings of ESCOM 2003)?
Since large individual differences in the size of pitch shifts have been observed, it would be interesting to run an additional experiment on each listener in which the pitch of a loud pure tone is compared with that of a quiet one (pitch shift due to SPL) and in which the pitches of two pure tones in a simultaneous dyad (say a minor third) of pure tones are measured. Listeners should be trained musicians who are good at focusing on pitch and ignoring other parameters like timbre and loudness, and it may be necessary to separately investigate this ability.
Perceptual
basis of Riemann's functional harmony
According to Riemann, all chords can be interpreted as either tonic T, dominant D or subdominant S. In a well-known undergraduate textbook, Dieter de la Motte labeled the diatonic major and minor triads in a major scale T, Sp, Dp or Tg, S, D, Tp; in a minor scale, t, dG or tP, s, D, sP or tG. This theory raises some interesting psychological questions:
Chord-scale
compatibility
in jazz
An important question in jazz theory and pedagogy is chord-scale compatibility: which scale goes with which chord (see wiki jazz scale)? There is no simple or generally accepted answer. Of course the chord tones must be part of the scale, and the scale itself should not include successive semitones (Pressing, Jazzforschung, 1977-78). But that leaves open many possibilities, e.g.: the scale should correspond to that of the main tonality, the scale should be as consonant as possible (with the greatest number of perfect fifths between scale steps), local leading tones (semitones below chord tones) should be preferred, and scale tones should be implied by the chord according to Terhardt's theory of pitch perception (Parncutt, 1988). Ideas of this kind can be tested by comparing their predictions with a statistical analysis of a database of transcribed improvised solos over different chord progressions. The progressions should contain a variety of chord types (e.g. chords based on 4 pcs - different kinds of seventh chord). 12-bar improvisations would be inadequate for this purpose, because they mainly involve major-minor ("dominant") seventh chords. From such a database it would be possible to estimate the probability of a given scale tone happening in the context of a given chord (cf. Järvinen's article in Music Perception in which he reproduced Krumhansl's key profiles from blues improvisations). Ideally, the calculations would be carried out on computer (first encode the transcriptions, then analyse them), but it would also be possible, and probably faster, to do the calculations by hand. In the write-up, statistical results might first be presented in conjunction with notated examples, and then compared with predictions based on the theories listed above.
Timbre and emotional implications of musical chords
Music theorists and analysts often allude to the different timbres and emotional implications of musical chords, but no study has described those timbres and implications, either qualitatively (in everday language) or quantitatively (on the basis of similarity judgments and multidimensional scaling solutions), in a way that has found its way back into music theory. How can the timbre and emotional flavour of a diminished seventh chord be described by comparison to that of a minor triad?
Expression
in Baroque harpsichord music
Louis Couperin and Jean-Francois Dandrieu wrote music for harpsichord that specifies only pitches and pitch successions, but no durational contrasts (all tones are notated as whole notes). An analysis of timing and dynamics in performances of such works could yield interesting information about performance conventions for that music, and perhaps more general expressive principles. Data could be both MIDI data from real performances by local musicians and data extracted from commercially available performances.
Mood
regulation
through music: musicians
versus non-musicians
Several studies have suggested that an important function of music is emotional self-regulation (see published studies by Saarikallio). For example, people put on a CD to put themselves in a certain kind of mood. Or they attend a choir rehearsal to forget about work. The question arises as to the effect of musical experience or expertise on such behaviors. Do musicians (or music students) regulate their mood this way, and if so, do they do it more or less often than non-musicians (or other students)? Do the two groups have different strategies? Which group can better explain what they are doing and why (metacognition)? One way to ask these questions is simply to interview people, but the results would be effected by participants' ability to describe their behavior (metacognition), which may be largely automatic and intuitive. Another idea is to contact people by mobile telephone at times of day when (according to self report) the chance is relatively high that they are consciously using music to influence their mood - or music is influencing their mood, whether they like it or not. Then ask them specific questions - what exactly is happening, what are they doing, what kind of music is it, who is in control of the music, how do they feel right now etc.
Self-efficacy
and mood
regulation through
music
Why do some children seem more musically talented than others? One approach to this problem involves attributions (Zuschreibungen; tacit explanations for success and failure) and self-efficacy (Selbstwirksamkeit; Austin et al., 2006; Bandura, 1977; Painsi, 2003). Children who believe that they can improve their musical skills through practice (which is realistic, because it applies to almost all children) make faster progress than other children, because they are more likely to persist when the going gets tough. They are also more likely to enjoy the process of learning, and be less dependent on the reward that is felt when a goal is achieved quickly and effortlessly. The application of the concept of self-efficacy to musical performance raises the question of whether it can also be applied in the complementary area of music perception. Research on music in everyday life has repeatedly demonstrated that people use music to manipulate their mood (e.g. Saarikallio & Erkkilä, 2007). For example, one might listen to a certain kind of music to get into the mood for going out in the evening, and another kind to recover from a serious loss. The question that I would like to ask in this project is whether this deliberate use of music is more common among people with high self-efficacy or whether it is independent of self-efficacy. The project would involve measuring the self-efficacy of a random population using a questionnaire, exploring how that same group interacts with music in everday life by means of another questionnaire, and comparing both quantitative and qualitative data from both questionnaires. Both questionnaires should as far as possible be taken from current literature and standardised so that results can be compared across studies.
Music
selection
and learned helplessness
According to some sociological studies, people who feel that they have little control over their own lives ("learned helplessness") tend to watch soap operas more often that other people do. A possible explanation is that soap operas compensate for their feeling of helplessness. That raises the question of whether learned helplessness affects the choice of music to listen to. If music often behaves like a virtual person, or like virtual people involved in some kind of drama (Parncutt & Kessler, 2006), we might expect an effect. Do people with learned helplessness prefer different kinds of music from other people? For this study you would need a standardised questionnaire about learned helplessness. You could simultaneously test the relationship between other personality traits and music preferences.
A seminar on the role of music in cultural integration was held in summer 2010. Six student groups interviewed representatives of six cultural groups in Graz. A masters or doctoral student could compare and reprocess their qualitative data and complement it with repeated, in-depth interviews with selected participants or participant responses to existing analyses. Results could have interesting political implications. Representatives of all political parties will agree that migration has specific advantages but also creates problems. Does musical diversity belong to the advantages? Can music be used to address or solve some of the problems? Could the City of Graz promote integration through music? If so, how? A good masters thesis could then be condensed into an article submission to the journal Music and Arts in Action.
The faculty of humanities has a doctoral programm ("Doktoratskolleg") entitled „Kategorien und Typologien in den Kulturwissenschaften“ . There are many possibilities for music psychological or systematic-musicological research within this area. For example there has been a lot of research recently on automatic style recognition in the international music information retrieval community. A researcher might for example attempt to automatically categorize a large set of mp3 files into different style categories such as pop, rock, jazz, classical and romantic - a difficult task, since there is so much sonic diversity within each such category. A style is a typical case of a cultural category: style categories help us to understand music in its diversity and in its cultural and historical contexts, but style boundaries are difficult to locate and depend themselves on cultural, historical and academic context. What are the implications of that research in music information retrieval for musicology in general?
References
You can find the full text of many of my relevant publications here.
Altenmüller, E., Wiesendanger, M., & Kesselring, J. (Eds.) (2006). Music, motor control and the brain. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Aures, W. (1985). Ein Berechnungsverfahren der Rauhigkeit. Acustica, 58, 268-281.
Austen, J., Renwick, J., & McPherson, G. E. (2006). Developing motivation. In G. E. McPherson (Ed.), The child as musician (pp. 211-238). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84,191-215.
Barnett, S. (2003). A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clinical Biomechanics, 15, 781 - 785.
Bregman, A. S. (1993). Auditory scene analysis: Hearing in complex environments. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.), Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 10-36). Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Clarke, E. (1995). Expression in performance: Generativity, perception and semiosis. In J. Rink (Ed.): The practice of performance (pp. 21-54). Cambridge Uni Press.
Curtis, M. E., & Bharucha, J. J. (2010). The minor third communicates sadness in speech, mirroring its use in music. Emotion,10, 335-48.
Drabkin, W. (2002). Heinrich Schenker. In T. Christensen (Ed.), Cambridge history of Western music theory (pp. 812-843). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eberlein, R. (1994). Die Entstehung der tonalen Klangsyntax. Frankfurt: Lang. Forte, A. (1973/1977). The structure of atonal music. New York: Yale University.
Forte, A., & Gilbert, S. E. (1982). An introduction to Schenkerian analysis. New York: Norton.
Gabrielsson, A. & Lindström Wik, S. (2003). Strong experiences related to music: A descriptive system. Musicae Scientiae, 7, 157-217.
Huron, D. (1994). Interval-class content in equally tempered pitch-class sets: Common scales exhibit optimum tonal consonance. Music Perception, 11, 289-305.
Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19, 1-64.
Huron, D. (2002). Music information processing using the Humdrum Toolkit: Concepts, examples, and lessons. Computer Music Journal, 26 (1), 15-30.
Hutchinson, W., & Knopoff, L. (1978). The acoustical component of western consonance. Interface, 7, 1-29.
Juslin, P.N., & Persson, R. S. (2002). Emotional communication. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.). The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 219-236). New York: Oxford University Press.
Krumhansl, C. L. & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organisation in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
Larson, S. (in press). Schenkerian analysis - Pattern, form, and expressive meaning. Prentice Hall.
Lehmann, A. C., Sloboda, J. A., & Woody, R. H. (2006). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Mastropieri, D., & Turkewitz, G. (1999). Prenatal experience and neonatal responsiveness to vocal expressions of emotion. Developmental Psychobiology, 35, 204-214.
Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken (5. Aufl.) Weinheim: Beltz. Muwi: 01:M474
McPherson, G. E. (Ed.) (2006). The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noorden, L. van (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven, NL.
Odam, G., & Bannan, N. (Eds.) (2005). The reflective conservatoire: Studies in music education. London : Guildhall School of Music & Drama.
Painsi, M. (2003). Attribution von Erfolg und Misserfolg bei Musikschülern, deren Eltern und Lehrer. Diplomarbeit, Institut für Psychologie, Uni Graz.
Palmer, C., & Hutchins, S. (2006). What is musical prosody? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 245-278. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Parncutt, R. (1988). Revision of Terhardt's psychoacoustical model of the root(s) of a musical chord. Music Perception, 6, 65-94.
Parncutt, R. (1993). Pitch properties of chords of octave-spaced tones. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 35-50.
Parncutt, R. (1996). Perceptual underpinnings of analytic techniques: From Rameau to Terhardt, Riemann to Krumhansl, Schenker to Bregman. Paper presentation at Society for Music Theory (Baton Rouge, Louisiana).
Parncutt, R., Sloboda, J. A., Clarke, E. F., Raekallio, M., & Desain, P. (1997 a). An ergonomic model of keyboard fingering for melodic fragments. Music Perception, 14, 341-382.
Parncutt, R. (1999 a). Tonality as implication-realization. In P. Vos and M. Leman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on Tonality Induction (Nijmegen, Netherlands, '99) (pp. 121-141). Nijmegen: NICI. (See also article in press for 2011 in Music Perception.)
Parncutt, R. (1999 b). Systematic evaluation of the psychological effectiveness of non-conventional notations and keyboard tablatures. In Zannos, I. (Ed.), Music and signs (pp. 146-174). Bratislava, Slovakia: ASCO Art & Science.
Parncutt, R. (2003). Accents and expression in piano performance. In K. W. Niemöller (Ed.), Perspektiven und Methoden einer Systemischen Musikwissenschaft (pp. 163-185). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
Parncutt, R. (2004). Enrichment of music theory pedagogy by computer-based repertoire analysis and perceptual-cognitive theory. In J. W. Davidson & H. Eiholzer (Eds.), The music practitioner: Research for the music performer, teacher and listener (pp. 101-116). London, England: Ashgate.
Parncutt, R. (2006 a). Commentary on Mashinter's "Calculating sensory dissonance". Empirical Musicology Review, 1 (4).
Parncutt, R. (2006 b). Prenatal development. In G. E. McPherson (Ed.), The child as musician (pp. 1-31). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Parncutt, R., & Kessler, A. (2006). Musik als virtuelle Person. In R. Flotzinger (Ed.), Musik als... Ausgewählte Betrachtungsweisen (pp. 9-52). Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Parncutt, R., McPherson, G., Painsi, M., & and Zimmer, F. (2006 c). Early acquisition of musical aural skills. Paper at 9th Int. Conf. on Music Perception and Cognition (Bologna, Italy, 21-26 August).
Read, G. (1987). Source book of proposed music notation reforms. New York: Greenwood.
Rink, J. (Ed., 1995). The practice of performance. Studies in musical interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rink, J. (Ed.) (2002). Musical performance, A guide to understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saarikallio, S., & Erkkilä, J. (2007). The role of music in adolescents' mood regulation. Psychology of Music, 35, 88-109.
Schenker, H. (1906). Harmonielehre. Wien: Universal.
Scherer, K. R., Zentner, M. R., & Schacht, A. (2001-02). Emotional states generated by music: An exploratory study of music experts. Musicae Scientiae (Special Issue), 149-171.
Schneider, P., Sluming, V., Roberts, N., Scherg, M., Goebel, R., Specht, H. J., Dosch, H. G., Bleeck, S., Stippich, C., & Rupp, A. (2005). Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl’s gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1241–1247.
Seither-Preisler, A., Johnson, L., Krumbholz, K., Nobbe, A., Patterson, R., Seither, S., et al. (2007). Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33 (3), 743-751.
Shoji, Y. Takasuka, T. Yasukawa, H. (2004). Personal identification using footstep detection. Proceedings of Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems. Sloboda, J. A. (1991). Music structure and emotional response: Some empirical findings. Psychology of Music, 19, 110-120.
Terhardt, E. (1976). Ein psychoakustisch begründetes Konzept der musikalischen Konsonanz. Acustica, 36, 121–137.
Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982). Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 679-688.
Vos, P. G. & Leman, M. (2000). Guest editorial: Tonality induction. Music Perception, 17, 401-402.
Williamon, A. (2004). Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance. London, England: Oxford University Press.
Further
information relevant for the project on walking and rhythm
Everyday technical innovations often make new experiments possible. Below is an example of a relevant newspaper report. The take-home message is this: Watch out for technical innovations that could enable you to perform a new experiment on a topic that interests you!
INNOVATIONS:
These Shoes Are Made for Talking
By Matt Villano
New York Times, November 1, 2006
It was a cold and
foggy afternoon the first time that Ulrike Krotscheck's Nike running
shoes spoke to her. Ms.
Krotscheck, a
graduate student in classics at Stanford University, was jogging
through Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, and after about 40 minutes
of running, she wanted to see how far she had run. So
she pushed a
button on her iPod Nano. The device instantly sent a wireless
electronic request to a battery-powered sensor in the sole of her left
shoe. The sensor responded immediately, dispatching the information in
a digital voice through her iPod: 5.2 miles. Ms.
Krotscheck
could hardly believe her earbuds. ''I
had gotten
used to calculating distances in my head,'' she said. ''The fact that
my sneakers were doing it for me was pretty amazing.'' Shoes
like these
might be the future of fitness. In the cutthroat shoe manufacturing
industry, two companies in particular -- Nike and Adidas -- are banking
on sensors and other technology to pump up profits and change the
notions of high-performance footwear forever. In
the last 12
months, both manufacturers have introduced footwear that communicates
wirelessly with other technology to provide information about a run.
The Nike shoe, called Nike Plus, delivers data on distance and pace.
The Adidas product, called adiStar Fusion, offers the same information
as well as data about heart rate. This is Adidas's second venture into
high-tech sneakers. Last year, the company introduced the Adidas 1, a
shoe that uses a battery-powered sensor to identify terrain and analyze
a runner's gait, then uses a motor-driven cable system to adjust the
cushion levels. If a runner is on a dirt trail that suddenly gets
muddy, the heel firms up. If the runner switches to asphalt, the heel
expands. Michael
Gartenberg, vice president and research director for Jupiter Research,
a market research firm in New York, said that while these products were
more likely to be popular among technophiles than runners, they should
attract interest from all sorts of customers during the holiday season.
''This
isn't
technology for technology's sake,'' said Mr. Gartenberg, who
specializes in personal technology. ''It's technology that truly does
enhance the running experience, and I think that's something customers
will respond to.'' Each
of the
latest high-tech sneakers works differently. The Nike Plus grew out of
a partnership with Apple, and works in conjunction with the iPod Nano.
The
system was
introduced in May and revolves around the Nike Plus iPod Sport Kit,
which is a microchip sensor and receiver. The runner places a
quarter-size sensor inside a built-in pocket in the sole of the shoe
and attaches a receiver to the bottom of the iPod. Once the sensor is
calibrated, the receiver enables the iPod to communicate with the
sensor in the shoe. During
a run, the
sensor collects data on speed and distance. When the runner wants this
information, the chip transmits it to the iPod, which interrupts the
music to announce a report in a computerized voice. The
iPod stores
the data, and when a runner docks the device at home, Apple's iTunes
software automatically uploads workout information to the Nikeplus.com
Web site. Trevor Edwards, Nike's vice president for global brand and
category management, said that this feature enabled runners to chart
their workouts. ''Most
people
these days are running with iPods anyway, so this seemed like the
perfect way to get the most out of the technology,'' Mr. Edwards said.
The system may also help strengthen Nike's bond with its customers.
''With everything from capturing the data to putting it online, this
system enables us to connect with our customers like never before,'' he
said. The
adiStar
Fusion achieves a similar result. The shoe, unveiled in October, came
about from a partnership with Polar Electro, a Finnish company known
for its heart-rate monitors. Like
Nike Plus,
the Adidas system requires the user to place a microchip in the sole of
a shoe. This chip, called the S3 Stride Sensor, made by Polar,
transmits speed and distance data to a device called the Polar RS800sd
Running Computer, which is worn like a wristwatch. Another
device is
a heart monitor called the Polar WearLink WIND, which incorporates data
about pulse. Runners can clip this sensor to a Polar chest strap, or
they can buy a special adiStar Fusion shirt, which works with the
sensor to collect heart-rate readings from tiny electrodes sewn into
the garment's material. The
RS800sd
computer compiles all the data and displays it in easy-to-read
statistics on the wristwatch. Christian DiBenedetto, program director
for intelligent products at Adidas, said that while the information was
not delivered in audio, the data about heart rate can help runners in
other ways. ''With
this
feedback during a run, you can better understand your body's
performance to give yourself a great opportunity for accomplishing your
personal best,'' Mr. DiBenedetto said. Neither
system is
cheap. The Nike Plus system runs about $300: $100 for the Air Moire or
Air Zoom shoes; $29 for the Nike Plus iPod Sport Kit; and $149 for an
iPod Nano. The Adidas system costs about $700: $120 for the adiStar
Fusion shoe; $65 for the adiStar Fusion shirt; and $489 for the Polar
sensor, heart monitor and the running computer. Another
drawback
of these sneakers is that they are available only in styles that have
soles equipped with spots for the sensors. Generally, these shoes have
average cushioning and little to no arch support. Gary
Muhrcke, who
owns Super Runner's Shop in Huntington, N.Y., said that this was a
problem because every person's foot is different. Some people need more
cushioning, others need more support. Mr. Muhrcke said that wearing the
wrong shoes could cause major injury. ''Sneakers
are
not one style fits all,'' he said. ''If you're a runner with wide feet
and you've been running in the same shoes for years, there's no way
you're going to cram your feet into one of these shoes just to get some
information off a computer.'' Enterprising
runners have found ways around this problem. Cindi Raykovich, a
co-owner of Sound Sports, a running store in Seattle, said her
customers have used the Nike sensor by wearing the technology in a Shoe
Pocket, a small walletlike pouch that can be attached to shoelaces. A
Nike salesman
frowned on this. During a recent visit to a NikeTown store in San
Francisco, the salesman said that using the sensor with any other
product could affect the readouts' accuracy. The Polar S3 Stride Sensor
comes with a hook to be laced on to just about any shoe. Still,
the two
manufacturers see room for improvements. Mr. Edwards, the Nike vice
president, said his company expected to make more shoes compatible with
Nike Plus in the months ahead. Mr. DiBenedetto said that Adidas planned
to make half its products compatible with Polar technology by 2010.
''We
see this as
the future,'' Mr. DiBenedetto said. ''Just as the industry accepted
midsoles in the 1970s, so, too, will we accept this kind of technology
down the road.'' How'm
I Running?
Sensors Know CONSIDERING I'm a runner and foam-at-the-mouth
technophile, it was no
surprise that I jumped at the chance to review the latest high-tech
footwear: Nike Plus, adiStar Fusion and Adidas 1. Over
all, I
preferred Nike Plus. The shoes themselves were surprisingly comfortable
(my feet usually don't like Nikes), and because the technology revolves
around the easy-to-use iPod Nano, I had no trouble figuring it out.
During
my runs, I
appreciated getting audio reports on my performance by pushing a
button, though I could have done without the cheesy motivational
mantras from the cyclist Lance Armstrong and the Olympic runner Paula
Radcliffe. The
Adidas
adiStar Fusion system was neat but confusing. While the heart-rate
readings were impressive, I found the wrist computer tough to program
and difficult to decipher midstride. And it required elbow grease to
get the sensor into the shoe. Both
this sensor
and the one in the Nike Plus took a few mile-long runs to calibrate
successfully -- a critical step if you want the technology to measure
distance accurately. Luckily, once the sensors are calibrated, you
don't need to endure the process again. (By the way, both manufacturers
say water has no effect on the performance of any of these shoes.)
Technologically
speaking, the Adidas 1 left the other sneakers behind. The geek in me
marveled at the tiny box of gears and motors in the sneaker's midsole,
and I spent an entire afternoon running from road to sand, just to feel
the heels adjust. Still,
from a
practical perspective, the Adidas 1 is a dud. Every adjustment eats up
battery life, so batteries need regular replacement. Equally perplexing
is the price: for $250, it may be more prudent to buy one pair of
cross-trainers and another for the road.
________________________________________________________________________________